The nature of heterodox economics

By Tony Lawson. 2006

242 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f28dce00765417d8ffe30a2aca9d92ebba0fec42

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. David Dequech
2. Leonhard Dobusch
3. Jakob Kapeller
4. Tony Lawson

Citations in the corpus

• What is this ‘school’ called neoclassical economics? (2013, background): “…overly superficial, on closer examination it is also apparent that the more sustainable causal ontology of openness, process, significant internal relationality and so on is nevertheless regularly, if often only implicitly, recognised, most especially by heterodox practitioners (see Lawson, 2006a).”
• Heterodox United vs. Mainstream City? Sketching a Framework for Interested Pluralism in Economics (2012, background): “Different authors present affirmative answers to this question, proposing ontological reflection (Bigo and Negru 2008; Caldwell 2004; Lawson 2006, 2010; Nelson 2003), methodological similarities (Dow 2004, 2008), opposition to mainstream economics (Colander et al. 2004; Dequech 2007–2008)1 or…”
• Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics (2007, methodology): “One of the most interesting contributions along these lines is that of Lawson (2006).”