The Nature of Heterodox Economics

By John B. Davis. 2006

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8754c644811937c0129fe33037e9d9db65ddae30

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Stretching Global Production Networks: The International Second-hand Clothing Trade (2013, background): “The importance of history, institutions – especially the role of charities in the second-hand clothing trade – and social structures must be recognized in trade geographies (Lawson, 2005).”
New foundations for ecological economics (2012, background): “Heterodox economists resist the mainstream reformulation of their concepts (e.g. uncertainty, evolutionary developments, institutions, motives, ethics) not so much through being committed to them per se, as insisting on their possessing specific ontological properties (Lawson, 2006).”
Social Ecological Economics: Understanding the Past to See the Future (2011, background): “Still the core conceptual foundations are clear and distinct from those of heterodox economics (see Lawson 2005).”
The Current Economic Crisis: Its Nature and the Course of Academic Economics (2009, background): “However, since the proper test of a theory is not the realism of its assumptions, but the acceptability of its implications, and since these assumptions imply equilibrium conditions which form a major part of classical financial doctrine, it is far from clear that the formulation should be rejected[”
The turn in recent economics and return of orthodoxy (2007, background): “There are important exceptions to this judgement (for example, neo-Ricardian economics), but I believe it is shared by most of the recent commentators on traditional heterodoxy (e.g. Backhouse, 2000; Dow, 2000; Lawson, 2006; Lee, 2006).”