Corporate responsibility activities and economic performance: a theory of why and how they are connected

By Leena Lankoski. 2008

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/504e10b33eaa4f6b4a47c727619b6912e98a38f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. O. Weber
2. Ingo Kleindienst
3. Sylvia Grewatsch
4. Angelika A. Sawczyn
5. Thomas M Fischer

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Ingo Kleindienst
2. Sylvia Grewatsch
3. Angelika A. Sawczyn
4. Thomas M Fischer
5. O. Weber

In Strategy and Management

1. O. Weber
2. Ingo Kleindienst
3. Sylvia Grewatsch
4. Angelika A. Sawczyn
5. Thomas M Fischer

Citations in the corpus

• Dynamics of Environmental and Financial Performance (2015, unknown): “Some researchers fuse the two approaches, proposing an inverted U–shaped or a U-shaped relationship between financial and environmental performance (e.g., Fujii, Iwata, Kaneko, & Managi, 2013; Lankoski, 2008).”
• The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance and the role of innovation: evidence from German listed firms (2013, background): “For example, satisfying stakeholders’ expectations with transparent CSP activities may improve employees’ motivation and result in improved productivity and reduced costs (Turban and Greening 1996; Lankoski 2008).”
• Impact of Corporate Environmental Responsibility on Operating Income: Moderating Role of Regional Disparities in China (2016, unknown): “By satisfying the needs of shareholders, enterprises can obtain competitive advantages, such as a good reputation, long-term and stable relationships with suppliers and consumers, and good relationship with investors (Bansal and Roth 2000; Hillman and Keim 2001; Orlitzky et al. 2003; Ambec and Lanoi”
• The concept of environmental performance and its measurement in empirical studies (2011, unknown): “However, the causal links between EP and CP and their influencing factors are still not identified sufficiently (Schaltegger and Synnestvedt 2002; Marom 2006; Lankoski 2008).”
• Corporate sustainability and financial performance of Chinese banks (2017, background): “…costs, to increase its reputation (Deephouse, Newburry, & Soleimani, 2016), and to address stakeholders that are interested in the firm’s social and environmental responsibility (Chan, 2010; Lankoski, 2008; Liu, Tang, Lo, & Zhan, 2016; Park & Ghauri, 2015; Qi et al., 2014; Waddock & Graves, 1997).”
• When Does It Pay to be Good? Moderators and Mediators in the Corporate Sustainability–Corporate Financial Performance Relationship: A Critical Review (2017, background): “CS activities improve the quality of information on stakeholder expectations and the holistic view along the product life cycle (Lankoski 2008).”