Dynamics of Environmental and Financial Performance

By Magali A. Delmas, Nicholas Nairn-Birch, Jinghui Lim. 2015

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ebb631fbcf8efd555da29baa7a09cc3184430186

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Stefan Lewandowski
2. Franziska Sump
3. Alexander Bassen
4. Xiaohong Chen
5. Shenggang Ren
6. Timo Busch

In Strategy and Management

1. Stefan Lewandowski
2. Ionica Oncioiu
3. Franziska Sump
4. Camelia Oprean-Stan
5. Sebastian-Emanuel Stan
6. Dayuan Li
7. Alexander Bassen
8. Xiaohong Chen

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance Revisited (2020, methodology): “We also control for capital intensity (Brouwers et al., 2015; Clarkson et al., 2015; Delmas et al., 2015; Fujii et al., 2013; Griffin et al., 2017; Iwata & Okada, 2011; Jung et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014).”
• Effects of corporate environmental responsibility on financial performance: The moderating role of government regulation and organizational slack (2017, methodology): “Thus, this study applied the lagged ROA (data from 2013 to 2015) as a proxy for future CFP to reflect the impact of CER (Aras et al. 2010, Delmas et al. 2015).”
• Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: A Meta‐analysis (2018, background): “Empirical findings support this (e.g., Delmas et al. 2015): firms with lower carbon intensities have on average a higher Tobin’s q .”
• Impact of Sustainability Reporting and Inadequate Management of ESG Factors on Corporate Performance and Sustainable Growth (2020, result): “In order to measure the market performance variable, we selected Tobin’s Q ratio, in line with other studies [117,118].”