High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe

By D. Keeble, F. Wilkinson. 2000

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fa819d11595c49f1f6e2052f856c3b652722967

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Metropolisation of the European Economic Territory as a Consequence of Increasing Specialisation of Urban Agglomerations in the Knowledge Economy (2007, background): “…the development chances of urban regions today are determined in particular by their potentials and capacities in the field of knowledge-intensive economic activities (Malecki & Oinas, 1999; Keeble & Wilkinson, 2000; Schamp, 2001; Cooke, 2002; Lo & Schamp, 2003; Matthiesen, 2004; Kujath, 2005a).”
Developing Biotechnology Clusters in Non‐high Technology Regions—The Case of Austria (2007, methodology): “Drawing on the work of Keeble (2000) and on our own conceptual research (Tödtling et al., 2006) we differentiate in the following between various types of knowledge flows, including: N spin-offs, N labour market recruitment and labour mobility, and N other knowledge interactions, comprising formal…”
How to institutionalize innovative clusters? Comparing explicit top-down and implicit bottom-up approaches (2005, unknown): “This is why the concept has especially been used in the con- text of promoting high technology areas (e.g. Keeble and Wilkinson, 2000).”
Scientific Mobility and Knowledge Transfer at the Interregional and Intraregional Level (2013, background): “Movements of skilled workers between local firms and universities are regarded to constitute a central mechanism of localized knowledge transfer (SAXENIAN, 1994; KEEBLE, 2000; LAWTON SMITH and WATERS, 2005), underpinning the dynamic development of high-technology regions.”
One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach (2005, background): “More recently attention has shifted to innovative regions and milieux (Camagni 1991, Ratti et al. 1997, Crevoisier 2001), high-tech-areas (Keeble and Wilkinson 1999, 2000), clusters of knowledge based industries (Cooke 2002) and knowledge spillovers (Audretsch and Feldman 1996, Bottazzi and Peri…”
Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views (2018, background): “Evidence from entrepreneurial ‘ hot-spots ’ and growth regions such as the Silicon Valley in the US (Saxenian, 1994) or Cam-bridge in the UK (Keeble & Wilkinson, 2000) where new economic paths seemed to have emerged ‘ spontaneously ’ was invoked to support the claim that it is first and foremost…”
Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links (2006, background): “Basically this is in line with the higher relevance of an analytical knowledge base and reflects other research on knowledge-based industries (Keeble & Wilkinson, 2000; Asheim & Gertler, 2005).”
The Firm or the Region: What Determines the Innovation Behavior of European Firms? (2001, background): “In recent years, economic geographers have intensively investigated the role played by cooperation in firms’ and regions’ innovation success, drawing on network theory and the importance of inter-SME linkages (see Keeble and Wilkinson 2000; Malecki 1997; Arndt and Sternberg 2000).”
Spatial Spillovers and Regional Growth: A Cognitive Approach (2009, methodology): “…learning process of this kind was first hypothesized by the GREMI group (Camagni, 1991; Perrin, 1995) and subsequently widely adopted as a sound theoretical concept for the interpretation of knowledge-based development and innovation (Keeble & Wilkinson, 1999, 2000; Capello, 1999; Cappellin, 2003).”
Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions (2008, background): “As a consequence, the focus of research partially has shifted from national to regional systems of innovation (Cooke et al., 2000, 2004) and to local industry clusters (Baptista and Swann, 1998; Keeble and Wilkinson, 2000; Malmberg and Maskell, 2002).”