Redistribution or Recognition?: A Political-Philosophical Exchange

By N. Fraser, A. Honneth, J. Golb, J. Ingram, C. Wilke. 2003

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. R. Gillard
2. C. Snell
3. Mark Bevan
4. V. Rao
5. Kate Brady
6. M. Walton
7. Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic
8. Reuben Binns

Citations in the corpus

• Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy (2017, background): “There is a debate about the extent to which equal cultural recognition and distributive egalitarianism are truly distinct notions; some argue that ‘recognition and distribution are two irreducible elements of a satisfactory theory of justice’, while others that ‘any dispute regarding redistribution ”
• Advancing an energy justice perspective of fuel poverty: Household vulnerability and domestic retrofit policy in the United Kingdom (2017, background): “Where such levels of recognition are lacking, injustices manifest in two ways: through social structures and institutions that ignore, misrepresent or reinforce inequalities, and through social processes that limit possibilities for expression and ostracise minorities [49].”
• Ethical norms and issues in crowdsourcing practices: A Habermasian analysis (2018, background): “(Honneth 2003) argument thus is that motivation for social change (and participation in discourse seeking ethical deliberation) comes from feelings of unrecognition or disrespect and that normative potential of social interaction (discourse) can be realised if conceived as a struggle for…”
• Culture and Public Action (2004, background): “Put another way, the issue is whether cultural recognition can be extended so as to enhance redistribution (see especially Fraser and Honneth 2003; Fraser 2001).”
• ‘Ah, but the whiteys love to talk about themselves’: discomfort as a pedagogy for change (2010, background): “This underscores the notion of the bivalence of social justice in education, as discussed by Fraser and Honneth (2003) i.”
• Rethinking cultural competence (2012, background): “Recognition of cultural diversity coupled with analysis of the structural sources of inequality offers us the best way to understand and redress the inequities and injustices that are ignored, or even aggravated, by culturally-blind health care (Fraser & Honneth, 2003).”
• Socially Response-Able Mathematics Education: Implications of an Ethical Approach. (2009, background): “1Feminist critique has constructed social justice as having two main agendas - distribution and of recognition (e.g. Fraser & Honneth, 2003; Young, 1990).”