Liberal democracy and sustainability

By Hugh Ward. 2008

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Social Sciences, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f80cd337b77e2430969d0feb581789c2dab4525

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Social Sciences

1. Daniel J. Fiorino
2. Kacper Szulecki
3. M. Baettig
4. M. Paterson
5. T. Bernauer
6. E. Lachapelle

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Daniel J. Fiorino
2. T. Bernauer
3. Kacper Szulecki
4. M. Baettig
5. M. Paterson
6. E. Lachapelle
7. Tobias Böhmelt

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Daniel J. Fiorino
2. Kacper Szulecki
3. M. Baettig
4. M. Paterson
5. T. Bernauer
6. E. Lachapelle
7. Brilé Anderson
8. Hugh Ward

Citations in the corpus

• Conceptualizing energy democracy (2018, background): “ity indicators than do non-democratic, authoritarian regimes, is not strong (Ward 2008).”
• Drivers of national climate policy (2013, background): “…of democratic regimes should lead them to outperform more autocratic countries in a range of environmental policy areas (Bättig & Bernauer, 2009; Bernauer & Koubi, 2009; Congleton, 1992), while others have been more sceptical of this claim (Li & Reuveny, 2006; Shearman & Smith, 2007; Ward, 2008).”
• Explaining national environmental performance: approaches, evidence, and implications (2011, methodology): “Ward's analysis of the effects of liberal democracy relative to autocracy is unusual first in using "sustainability" to describe the dependent variable (2008). It then differentiates between two”
• Human drivers of national greenhouse-gas emissions (2012, unknown): “…handful of studies that have explored existing data have found weak links, but are compromised because of their reliance on data sets never intended for the purpose for which they were used — country coverage is limited and key measures from the social psychological literature are omitted 84–86 .”
• National Institutions and Global Public Goods: Are Democracies More Cooperative in Climate Change Policy? (2009, background): “…have a strong motivation to wait and let the big countries move ahead first+ A simple test questions this assumption+ In 23+ See, for example, Ward 2008; Neumayer 2002; and Li and Reuveny 2006+ 24+ See, for example, Congleton 1992; and Midlarsky 1998+ the data set we use for this article…”
• Public opinion and environmental policy output: a cross-national analysis of energy policies in Europe (2017, background): “However, controlling for other factors, democracies do not emit significantly less carbon per-capita (Cao and Ward 2015, Ward 2008).”