Drivers of national climate policy

By E. Lachapelle, M. Paterson. 2013

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7ffadf9b9b40076e78a37dac08ed84daa5c8bd6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Environmental Engineering

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Varieties of capitalism and clean energy transitions in the European Union: When renewable energy hits different economic logics (2016, background): “…is in line with the evidence from other political–economic analyses that show the advantage of CMEs in green industries (Bernauer & Böhmelt, 2013; Lachapelle & Paterson, 2013) and challenges the assumption of the VOC literature about the complementarity among different VOCs regarding economic…”
Varieties of coal-fired power phase-out across Europe (2019, methodology): “study of the impact that variety in institutional constellations has on national climate policy (Lachapelle and Paterson, 2013).”
The political economy of passing climate change legislation: Evidence from a survey (2015, background): “Lachapelle and Paterson (2013), Bernauer and Koubi (2009) and Fredriksson et al. (2005) test these theories empirically.”
Trasformismo or transformation? The global political economy of energy transitions (2018, background): “Whilst there is not space to here to delve into these national experiences in greater depth, it is notable that variation in the institutional form of country level governance regimes, patterns of dependence on fossil fuel energy, systemic differences among states including their population densitie”
Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: A research agenda (2017, background): “There is mixed evidence on whether this ‘varieties of capitalism’ framework can satisfactorily explain diversity in outcomes related to environmental sustainability (Neumayer 2003, Scruggs 2004, Poloni-Staudinger 2008, Lachapelle and Paterson 2013).”
Innovations in climate policy: the politics of invention, diffusion, and evaluation (2014, background): “But despite many recent references to new narratives and forms of climate politics and policy (Lachapelle and Paterson 2013), the ‘new’ climate governance research field is still relatively inchoate.”