Explaining national environmental performance: approaches, evidence, and implications

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Institutions, Climate Change, and the Foundations of Long-Term Policymaking (2019, background): “While a long tradition in comparative politics focuses on the environment (Duit, 2014; Fiorino, 2011; Jänicke & Jörgens, 1998; Lundqvist, 1980; Schreurs, 2003; Scruggs, 2003; Vogel, 1986; Ward & Cao, 2012), there has been relatively less engagement with the problem of climate change.”
Public opinion and environmental policy output: a cross-national analysis of energy policies in Europe (2017, background): “According to this work, democracies are more likely to commit to environmental policies than non-democracies (Bättig and Bernauer 2009, Neumayer 2002, Fiorino 2011, Schaffer and Bernauer 2014).”
Welfare states and environmental states: a comparative analysis (2013, background): “The five Is framework is not itself a theory but a heuristic which embraces all the major theoretical currents in comparative welfare state research (see Gough 2008 for a fuller explanation). It evidently operates at a high level of abstraction and cannot be applied to explain specific social policy”
The environmental state and the glass ceiling of transformation (2020, background): “The focus was on pollution control and environmental management through technological solutions and regulation (Fiorino 2011, Meadowcroft 2012).”