Affective neuroscience of pleasure: reward in humans and animals

By Kent C. Berridge, Morten L. Kringelbach. Psychopharmacology, 2008

1,201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f76d400566e256852da82a2935e7483a053aff0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Sensory Systems

Citations in the corpus

Valence and Value (2018, positive): “Indeed, I suggest that the distinction drawn in the empirical literature between liking and wanting (Berridge & Kringelbach, 2008) is really a difference between pleasure at the thought of doing something, which may lead to a decision to do it (liking), and primitively-caused approach or…”
Architectural design and the brain: effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions (2015, background): “…that regions of the brain that underlie the experience of affect, emotion, pleasure and reward might be responsive to opennessdthe reverse of perceived enclosure (see Barrett et al., 2007; Barrett & Wager, 2006; Berridge & Kringelbach, 2009; Chatterjee & Vartanian, 2014; Kringelbach, 2005).”
Affective Neuroscience: Past, Present, and Future (2009, background): “Similarly, there is also an increasing recognition of the need to better understand the generation and regulation of positive, as well as negative, affect (for reviews see Berridge & Kringelbach, 2008; Burgdorf & Panksepp, 2006).”
The tempted brain eats: pleasure and desire circuits in obesity and eating disorders. (2010, neutral): “In particular, it is not yet clear whether orbitofrontal or other cortical activations play strong roles in actually causing the food pleasures they code, or instead some other functions (Berridge and Kringelbach, 2008; Kringelbach and Berridge, 2010; Smith et al., 2010).”
Individual Differences in Music Reward Experiences (2013, background): “…as monetary reward)—to be a higher-order pleasure that may require further or different processing than more basic rewards (e.g., sex and food), even though they may share similar brain mechanisms (Berridge & Kringelbach, 2008; Blood & Zatorre, 2001; Menon & Levitin, 2005; Salimpoor et al., 2011).”
The role of the nucleus accumbens and rostral anterior cingulate cortex in anhedonia: Integration of resting EEG, fMRI, and volumetric techniques (2009, background): “Neuroimaging studies have also linked the experience of pleasure to neural activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (Berridge and Kringelbach, 2008; Phan et al., 2002).”
Neuroaesthetics: A Coming of Age Story (2011, background): “Intermediate vision segregates some elements and groups others together to form coherent regions inwhat would otherwise be a chaotic and overwhelming sensory array (Ricci, Vaishnavi, & Chatterjee, 1999; Grossberg, Mingolla,&Ros, 1997; Vecera&Behrmann, 1997; Biederman & Cooper, 1991).”
Beyond Cumulative Risk: A Dimensional Approach to Childhood Adversity (2016, background): “Reward-learning processes track the probability and magnitude of rewards associated with particular cues and influence feelings of pleasure during the anticipation and receipt of rewards as well as actions toward future rewards (Berridge & Kringelbach, 2008).”
‘Liking’ and ‘wanting’ food rewards: Brain substrates and roles in eating disorders (2009, background): “Another evolutionary pressure that may have promoted a distinct mechanism for ‘wanting’ is the need for a common neural currency of incentive salience shared by all rewards, which could compare and help decide choices for competing rewards of food, sex, and other incommensurate types of pleasure tha”
Ever-changing cycles of musical pleasure: The role of dopamine and anticipation. (2012, background): “As suggested by a large body of work (e.g., see Berridge & Kringelbach, 2008), liking is the actual pleasure component or hedonic impact of a reward, which comprises two levels: (1) core “liking” reactions that need not necessarily be conscious, (2) conscious experiences of pleasure, in the…”