Self-assessments of creativity: Not ideal, but better than you think.

By James C. Kaufman. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2019

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f6e187465aeddf21f18a805cdb3ff4817767083

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. R. Reiter‐Palmon
2. Richard W. Hass
3. Baptiste Barbot

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. R. Reiter‐Palmon
2. Baptiste Barbot
3. Richard W. Hass
4. Maciej Karwowski
5. James C. Kaufman
6. R. Beghetto

In Information Systems

1. R. Reiter‐Palmon
2. Richard W. Hass
3. Baptiste Barbot

Citations in the corpus

• Creativity assessment in psychological research: (Re)setting the standards. (2019, methodology): “Mirroring current practice in the field (Snyder, Hammond, Grohman, & Katz-Buonincontro, 2019), this special issue represents this type of measures only limitedly (Barbot, 2019; Kaufman, 2019).”