Public Intimacy: Disclosure Interpretation and Social Judgments on Facebook

By Natalya N. Bazarova. 2012

292 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f48b9d6d7210e5b4784b09f4bea8b8fef988ee0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The emotional responses of browsing Facebook: Happiness, envy, and the role of tie strength (2015, background): “New communication technologies such as social media have made social news more pervasive (Bazarova, 2012).”
Influence of Social Support Received in Online and Offline Contexts on Satisfaction With Social Support and Satisfaction With Life: A Longitudinal Study (2015, background): “However, intimacy is hard to experience in a context in which some interactants are close and others are hardly known (Bazarova, 2012; Scott et al., 2006).”
The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection (2015, background): “This leaves us with the question of whether social penetration theory also holds for (semi-)public communication on social media and which other theories can help to explain the relational effects of self-disclosure on social media.”
Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale (2017, background): “Perceived affordances could explain why or when people switch channels in interpersonal relationships (modality switching; Ramirez & Zhang, 2007) or why perceptions or effects of a message vary when delivered via different channels (disclosure personalism; Bazarova, 2012).”
Social Network Sites, Individual Social Capital and Happiness (2016, background): “Positive status updates on SNSs are associated with higher social attractiveness of the sender (Antheunis et al. 2010; Bazarova 2012) and receive a larger number of reactions (Utz 2011) and more positive reactions (Forest and Wood 2012) from SNS contacts.”
Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp (2017, unknown): “Indeed, a study by Bazarova (2012) found that public intimate disclosures were considered less acceptable compared to private intimate disclosures.”
Self‐Disclosure in Social Media: Extending the Functional Approach to Disclosure Motivations and Characteristics on Social Network Sites (2014, background): “…communication forms have been shown to influence how people perceive and experience interaction , including interpretations of self-disclosure (Bazarova, 2012), social capital gains (Burke et al., 2010), and language use and strategic self-presentation (Bazarova, Taft, Choi, & Cosley, 2013).”
Managing Impressions and Relationships on Facebook (2013, background): “…in cost for a sender may come, however, with a price of reduced intimacy in receivers’ message interpretation, as readers of a wall post can discount the relational value of a message and relational ties between a sender and a receiver compared with a private, dyadic exchange (Bazarova, 2012).”