Event structure in perception and conception.
By Jeffrey M. Zacks, Barbara Tversky. Psychological bulletin, 2001
1,151 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cultural Studies, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f3a17d2921e5bee57794f4cca14a81f59afe42b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cultural Studies
- Brian P. Bailey
- Piotr D. Adamczyk
- J. V. van Merriënboer
- Fred Paas
- Pieter Wouters
- Marina Terkourafi
- Matthew Botvinick
- Barbara Tversky
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Fred Paas
- J. V. van Merriënboer
- Matthew Botvinick
- Pieter Wouters
- J. Cohen
- Brian P. Bailey
- Piotr D. Adamczyk
- Mary Hegarty
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Fred Paas
- Pieter Wouters
- Matthew Botvinick
- J. V. van Merriënboer
- J. Cohen
- Mary Hegarty
- John Sweller
- Brian P. Bailey
Citations in the corpus
- Event categorisation and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion (2010, background): “…objects, events are fleeting and impermanent: event components have to be extracted from the stream of an observer’s dynamic experience of the world and stitched together into cohesive wholes (Avrahami & Kareev, 1994; Newtson & Engquist, 1976; Zacks & Tversky, 2001; Zacks, Tversky, & Iyer, 2001).”
- Distributive justice, procedural justice, exemplarity, and employees’ willingness to cooperate in M&A integration processes : An analysis of the Air France-KLM merger (2011, background): “First, contrary to traditional organizational events that have a known beginning and end (Zacks & Tversky, 2001), M&As are ongoing organizational processes with multiple decision-making events.”
- Hip and trendy: Characterizing emerging trends on Twitter (2011, background): “The definition and characterization of “event” has received substantial attention across academic fields, from philosophy (“Events,” 2002) to cognitive psychology (Zacks and Tversky, 2001).”
- Towards automatic extraction of event and place semantics from flickr tags (2007, neutral): “socially common) semantics of “event” and “place” [27].”
- AVA: A Video Dataset of Spatio-Temporally Localized Atomic Visual Actions (2017, background): “We recommend [38] to the reader interested in a more detailed account.”
- How to Optimize Learning From Animated Models: A Review of Guidelines Based on Cognitive Load (2008, methodology): “The segmentation of an event can be based on the model of event perception (Zacks & Tversky, 2001), which assumes that a continuous event is cognitively represented in a highly structured manner.”
- Layered representations for learning and inferring office activity from multiple sensory channels (2004, background): “Psychologists have, in fact, found that many human behaviors are hierarchically structured [ 23 ].”
- Visualizing Thought (2011, background): “Although organizing a sketch using pictorial space may aid comprehension of the components of the system, it could prevent designers from ‘‘seeing’’ and using other organizations of components that might make better sense for the design.”
- What Do Entrepreneurs Actually Do? An Observational Study of Entrepreneurs’ Everyday Behavior in the Start–Up and Growth Stages (2012, background): “Zacks and Tversky (2001) suggested that actions and events, like objects, could be regarded as organized into partonomic hierarchies, reflecting “part of” relations, or into taxonomic hierarchies, reflecting “kind of” relations.”
- If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution (2004, methodology): “This is an extension from the fact that it is these moments that people tend to recall most frequently and in the appropriate order [ 33 ].”
- Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. (2004, background): “Indeed, there is evidence that the identification of event boundaries can depend on knowledge concerning the sequential structure of the domain (see Avrahami & Kareev, 1994; Zacks & Tversky, 2001; Saffran, 2001).”