Identifying Software Project Risks: An International Delphi Study

By R. Schmidt, Kalle J. Lyytinen, Mark Keil, P. Cule. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2001

1,382 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f217ae7736bde9af1178dec3349444fe84cfab6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Complexity of Information Systems Development Projects: Conceptualization and Measurement Development (2005, methodology): “In today’s hypercompetitive business environment, users’ information needs change frequently, which requires substantial coordination and rework [12, 58, 59].”
Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research (2011, background): “In addition, pilot study of individual interviews with members of interest groups [39] or exploration of the results with a different [135] or similar sample across different geographical locations [136] have also been utilised.”
Toward Agile: An Integrated Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Field Data (2010, background): “The unprecedented rate of change in business and technology has made it increasingly difficult for software teams to determine user requirements and respond to their changes (Schmidt et al. 2001).”
Consensus measurement in Delphi studies (2012, methodology): “7 (strong agreement) [38,96]”
Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions (2014, background): “Additional approaches (e.g. Al-Ahmad et al. 2009; Barclay 2008; Dwivedi et al. 2013b; Kappelman et al. 2006; Schmidt et al. 2001; Wallace et al. 2004; Yeo 2002) have provided alternative perspectives on common causes of IS project failure, for example the concept of “ project escalation ” (Keil et…”
Risk and risk management in software projects: A reassessment (2008, background): “More extensive lists can be found in Addison and Vallabh (2002), Barki et al. (1993), and Schmidt et al. (2001).”
How Software Project Risk Affects Project Performance: An Investigation of the Dimensions of Risk and an Exploratory Model (2004, background): “(Barki et al., 1993; Kemerer & Sosa, 1988; McFarlan, 1981; Schmidt et al., 2001)”
Components of Software Development Risk: How to Address Them? A Project Manager Survey (2000, background): “We should also be aware that our study focuses exclusively on project managers’ perceptions of managing project related software risks and ignores important risk items that relate to the broader management environment, including political risks, business risks, and implementation risks ([34], [ 45 ]”
Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis (2004, background): “Though several lists of risk factors have been published (e.g. [2,17,41,54]), until relatively recently there has been little attempt to move beyond checklists and frameworks.”
A Delphi-based risk analysis — Identifying and assessing future challenges for supply chain security in a multi-stakeholder environment (2013, methodology): “and Cule, 2001 [55] Journal of”
Understanding current and future issues in collaborative consumption: A four-stage Delphi study (2016, methodology): “…technique to information technology have included IT project management (Kasi et al., 2008; Keil et al., 2013), software project risk management (Schmidt et al., 2001), IT outsourcing (Nakatsu and Iacovou, 2009), the impact of enterprise systems in the supply chain (Akkermans et al., 2003), and…”
Assessing risk in ERP projects: identify and prioritize the factors (2004, background): “Delphi is a group process that may use written media to solicit and aggregate information from a group of disjoint individuals ( Schmidt et al. , 2001”