Multifunctional shade‐tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes – a review

By T. Tscharntke, Y. Clough, Shonil Bhagwat, D. Buchori, Heiko Faust, D. Hertel, Dirk Hölscher, J. Juhrbandt, M. Kessler, I. Perfecto and 4 more. 2011

760 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Forestry, Horticulture

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e685158028922b3e222275c9c1fc99e9cb50a9c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Forestry

1. S. McIntyre
2. M. Willig
3. David B. Lindenmayer
4. T. Tscharntke

In Horticulture

1. G. Schroth
2. T. Tscharntke

Citations in the corpus

• Toward a theory of business (2015, background): “Grim as the situation is, Tscharntke et al. (2011) do offer a host of ideas to reverse the situation.”
• Ecosystem services by birds and bees to coffee in a changing climate: A review of coffee berry borer control and pollination (2019, background): “In particular, shaded coffee systems have been shown to support greater levels of native biodiversity compared to other crops and other coffee management systems (Greenberg et al., 1997a, 1997b; Komar, 2006; Jha and Dick, 2010; Tscharntke et al., 2011; Jha et al., 2011, 2014; Frishkoff et al., 2014;”
• COCOA AND TOTAL SYSTEM YIELDS OF ORGANIC AND CONVENTIONAL AGROFORESTRY VS. MONOCULTURE SYSTEMS IN A LONG-TERM FIELD TRIAL IN BOLIVIA (2016, neutral): “AFs hold a high ecological and social potential (Clough et al. , 2009; Jacobi et al. , 2014; Tscharntke et al. , 2011), as the multiple products grown along with cocoa contribute to farmers’ livelihoods (Cerda et al. , 2014; Somarriba et al. , 2014) and ensure long-term stable cocoa yields (Obiri…”
• Shaded Coffee and Cocoa : Double Dividend for Biodiversity and Small-scale Farmers (2017, background): “Together, coffee and cocoa represent an important component of the international commodity trade volume (Tscharntke et al., 2011), providing income for over 30 million smallholders, predominantly in developing countries (Ovalle-Rivera et al., 2015; Ponte, 2002).”
• Climate change adaptation, mitigation and livelihood benefits in coffee production: where are the synergies? (2014, background): “Traditional coffee agroforests can make a significant contribution to biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration (Tscharntke et al. 2011; Albrecht & Kandji 2003), although this role is increasingly threatened by the intensification of coffee production systems (Somarriba et al. 2004; Vaast…”
• How well do we understand landscape effects on pollinators and pollination services (2012, background): “Studies indicate that the abundance and richness of native pollinators may increase significantly as the distance to natural environments decreases, which also affects agricultural production (Steffan-Dewenter & Tschanrtke 1999; Greenleaf & Kremen 2006, Klein 2009; Tscharntke et al. 2011).”
• Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges (2020, background): “B 3750190120 6 [31,75,76]; (iii) nature-based agricultural practices such as agroforestry (planting trees among crops or crops among trees) can maintain and in some cases enhance yields in drier, more variable climates [36,77]; and (iv) creating green roofs and walls, and/or planting trees and incre”
• The future of agri‐environment schemes: biodiversity gains and ecosystem service delivery? (2011, background): “Tscharntke et al. (2011) highlight the related issue of ecological resilience, which is threatened by destruction of shade trees planted in tropical agroforestry landscapes.”