The future of agri‐environment schemes: biodiversity gains and ecosystem service delivery?

By Mark J. Whittingham. 2011

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ebba742f71d6c12b5e18e4a7795afc16c213c1aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

A diagnostic framework for food system governance arrangements: The case of South Africa (2018, background): “Although much further work is needed to accurately quantify the impact of the loss of wildlife on food security (e.g. the extent of reductions in pollination services, pest control, and so forth, due to wildlife loss), it is clear that the relationship is a negative one (Whittingham, 2011).”
What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis (2015, background): “He provides the example of the unpopularity among farmers of AES options in England that require them to manage land within the crop itself (Whittingham, 2011).”
Is regular mowing the most appropriate and cost-effective management maintaining diversity and biomass of target forbs in mountain hay meadows? (2012, unknown): “However, to get these subsidies in several counries the regular yearly mowing of the entire meadow is required Whittingham, 2011).”
Optimizing agri-environment schemes for biodiversity, ecosystem services or both? (2014, background): “Many existing AES are not easily classified as biodiversity conservation or ecosystem service schemes, such as those targeted at particular bird species (Whittingham, 2011).”
Assessing global land use : balancing consumption with sustainable supply (2014, background): “Including stakeholders in the design of targeted schemes with careful management advice can yield substantial benefits for farmland biodiversity, and the potential to combine agri-environment schemes with the provision of ecological services might be a good way forward (Whittingham 2011).”
Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes ‐ eight hypotheses (2012, background): “With respect to cultural services, the public is often concerned about the loss of common species, such as the currently declining common farmland birds in Europe (Whittingham, 2011).”
Bioenergy, Food Production and Biodiversity – An Unlikely Alliance? (2015, background): “When properly managed using welldesigned agri-environment schemes, wildlife-friendly farming practices can be successful in sustaining biodiversity (Ausden, 2007; Carvell et al., 2007, 2011; Whittingham, 2011), but this approach is not widely applied to bioenergy crops at present.”