Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations

By A. Jones, W. Ardren. Molecular Ecology, 2003

654 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e475947fd7940d1b50819cfd452736c5d2eef5a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Measuring pollen flow in forest trees: an exposition of alternative approaches (2004, background): “Jones and Ardren (2003) review the software packages available and their optimal use.”
Organismal and 'gametic' capture-recapture using microsatellite genotyping confirm low abundance and reproductive autonomy of humpback whales on the wintering grounds of New Caledonia (2004, methodology): “Although there is no general agreement on criteria required for categorical paternity inference in wild populations (e.g. Jones & Ardren 2003), several characteristics of our data and analysis indicated that paternity inferences were robust for 5 of the 16 calves.”
Constraints on control: factors influencing reproductive success in male mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) (2005, positive): “Jones and Ardren (2003) have suggested that CERVUS version 2.0 (Marshall et al., 1998; Slate et al., 2000) is the most accurate program to reconstruct pedigrees.”
Plant Parentage, Pollination, and Dispersal: How DNA Microsatellites Have Altered the Landscape (2010, methodology): “A detailed review of methods of parentage analysis is beyond the scope of this paper, and I refer readers to several recent reviews on the subject (Blouin, 2003; Jones and Ardren, 2003; Jones et al., 2010).”
Genomic selection in forest tree breeding: the concept and an outlook to the future (2014, neutral): “There are large numbers of statistical methods developed for kinship and parentage analysis from DNA markers; including parental exclusion, allocation and parental reconstruction (Jones and Ardren 2003; Jones et al. 2010).”
Response to domestication and selection for growth in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in separate and mixed tanks (2009, positive): “The parentage assignment was established with a new software (Galli, in prep.) using the exclusion method based on Mendelian rules of inheritance (Jones and Ardren, 2003) or calculating the likelihood of each potential parental pair (Duchesne et al., 2002).”
Molecular ecology of marine turtles: New approaches and future directions (2008, methodology): “A recent review on methods of parentage analysis and computing packages is a good starting point in understanding various analytical approaches (Jones and Ardren, 2003).”
The reintroduction of the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) into the Netherlands: hidden life revealed by noninvasive genetic monitoring (2010, methodology): “Since all potential parents were known, we applied complete exclusion as our method of parentage analysis (Blouin 2003; Jones and Ardren 2003).”
kingroup: a program for pedigree relationship reconstruction and kin group assignments using genetic markers (2004, methodology): “Suitable molecular markers have become more readily available, and methods for using such information to greatest effect need to be developed and improved (Blouin 2003; Jones & Ardren 2003).”
DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations (2003, background): “There are so many variations on basic parentage analysis that it warrants separate treatment and will not be covered here (see [ 21 ] for a recent review).”
Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. (2005, methodology): “The list is not exhaustive and presents only the latest or most widely used methods in the literature; methods of parentage analysis have been recently reviewed elsewhere [ 58 ] and were not included.”
Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model". (2004, methodology): “Numerous different analytical techniques and software have been developed for the purpose of parentage assignment using molecular data (see review in Jones & Ardren 2003).”
Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. (2004, result): “In contrast, all previous group-likelihood approachesship of a parental pair and an offspring (Jones and Ardren 2003) or combinations of candidate relation- ignored typing errors and mutations completely.”