Recycling Gone Bad: When the Option to Recycle Increases Resource Consumption

By J. Catlin, Yitong Wang. 2013

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e3f3401fbf9699fe1e61d5e43063a7e86d3de81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Karin Schanes
2. R. Gifford
3. Andreas Nilsson

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Andreas Nilsson
2. R. Gifford
3. M. Kohlová
4. Magnus Bergquist
5. Wesley Schultz
6. J. Urban
7. Š. Bahník
8. Susanne Stoll-Kleemann

In Marketing

1. Karin Schanes
2. R. Gifford
3. Andreas Nilsson
4. Magnus Bergquist
5. Wesley Schultz
6. J. Urban

Citations in the corpus

• Environmental psychology matters. (2014, methodology): “When participants in two different contexts had structural facilities available for recycling, they used more paper than when facilities were not available (Catlin & Wang 2013).”
• Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: a review and research agenda (2017, background): “This effect was partially replicated in a restroom, showing that the presence of a recycling bin increased paper usage by 50%, compared to a control condition (Catlin and Wang 2012).”
• Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products (2013, unknown): “…value to future researchers interested in understanding how consumers' green consumption values affect their responses to environmentally-based marketing actions, which has been of growing interest to researchers and marketers alike (Catlin & Wang, 2013; Peloza et al., 2013; White & Simpson, 2013).”
• Food waste matters - A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications (2018, background): “Recycling may even induce an increase in waste production by mitigating the guilt associated with wasteful consumption (Catlin and Wang, 2012).”
• Green consumption does not make people cheat: Three attempts to replicate moral licensing effect due to pro-environmental behavior (2019, background): “…have examined the inhibitory effect of one pro-environmental behavior on the probability of subsequent environmental behavior (e.g., Catlin & Wang, 2013; Geng et al., 2016; Tiefenbeck, Staake, Roth, & Sachs, 2013) or pro-environmental intention (e.g., Garvey & Bolton, 2017; Geng et al.,…”