The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms

By N. Çapar, Masaaki Kotabe. 2003

684 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d8cc542d64b30f988b8de533187e736e7e5dd7a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

A theoretical assessment of the empirical literature on the impact of multinationality on performance (2011, background): “But poor appropriability is not always the rule and, as Chesbrough (2003) has shown, in-firm sources (closed innovation) do not always provide better learning opportunities than independent ones (open innovation).”
Corporate diversification: the impact of foreign competition, industry globalization, and product diversification (2008, background): “The most commonly used measure is the ‘foreign sales ratio,’ defined as a firm’s foreign sales divided by its total sales (Capar and Kotabe, 2003; Geringer et al., 1989, 2000; Grant et al., 1988; Tallman and Li, 1996).”
The relationship between international diversification and firm performance: Why it remains a puzzle (2011, background): “…the construct of international diversification using the foreign sales ratio, defined as the ratio of a firm’s foreign sales to its total sales (Capar and Kotabe, 2003; Geringer, Beamish, and daCosta, 1989; Geringer, Tallman, and Olsen, 2000; Grant, Jammine, and Thomas, 1988; Rugman, 1979);…”
Firm-Specific Assets, Multinationality, and Financial Performance: A Meta-analytic Review and Theoretical Integration (2011, neutral): “(Advanced) Carpenter (2002) Manufacturing U.”
Barriers and public policies affecting the international expansion of Latin American SMEs: Evidence from Brazil, Colombia, and Peru (2016, background): “The foreign sales/total sales ratio is an established measure of expansion performance (Bonaccorsi, 1992; Calof, 1994) and its use isconsistentwithprevious studies in international businessliter-ature (see for example (Capar & Kotabe, 2003; Geringer, Tallman, & Olsen, 2000)).”
Earliness of internationalization and performance outcomes: Exploring the moderating effects of venture age and international commitment (2014, background): “…with foreign buyers, institutions, or research centers, young firms can obtain new and diverse resources and knowledge from a greater number of new and different markets, as well as from a wide range of cultural perspectives (Capar & Kotabe, 2003; Hitt, Hoskisson, & Kim, 1997; Zahra et al., 2000).”
The effect of product diversification strategies on the relationship between international diversification and firm performance (2007, methodology): “Capar and Kotabe (2003) focused on German enterprises.”