A model of serious leisure identification: the case of football fandom

By I. Jones. 2000

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d0d1e7fce9b335c8fe097f76003771d838e851c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Development of the Serious Leisure Inventory and Measure (2008, background): “Kane and Zink (2004) observed the importance of ‘‘training and skills advancement’’ (p.”
The Serious Leisure Perspective and the Experience of Leisure (2017, background): “These have included sport fans (Jones, 2000; Gibson et al., 2002), participants in athletic events (Derom & Taks, 2011), gun collectors and skydivers (Anderson & Taylor, 2010), and bridge players (Scott & Godbey,”
Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Online Travel Communities (2014, unknown): “…& Bonnes, 2005; Nunkoo & Gursoy, 2012; Williams, McDonald, Riden, & Uysal, 1995), serious leisure participants’ continued engagement in an activity group (Green & Jones, 2005; I. Jones, 2000; Shamir, 1992), and even hotel employees’ service performances (Solnet, 2007; Solnet & Paulsen, 2005).”
Examining the longitudinal structure, stability, and dimensional interrelationships of team identification (2014, background): “However, some studies have presented alternate perspectives, noting the propensity of fans to support losing or undesirable teams (Campbell, Aiken, & Kent, 2004; Jones, 2000).”
The Travelling Fan: Understanding the Mechanisms of Sport Fan Consumption in a Sport Tourism Setting (2007, background): “Jones (2000) determined that football fans manage CORFing by adopting a high degree of ‘in-group favouritism’ where feelings of solidarity and emotional closeness are conferred upon ‘fellow travellers’ where the discussion transitions away from the result and moves toward the quality of play and…”
Rival conceptions of rivalry: why some competitions mean more than others (2015, unknown): “…to find other bases of group distinction for self-esteem enhancement (Bourdieu, 1987), such as redefining success through a team’s style of play (Jones, 2000), the attractiveness of group members (Trail, Robinson, Dick, & Gillentine, 2003), or the team’s home city (Lock, Taylor, & Darcy, 2011).”
Exploring the development of team identification: the contribution of social identity and the psychological continuum model (2012, unknown): “This requires more innovative image management tactics, such as: derogating or blasting members of rival out-groups (Cialdini & Richardson, 1980); talking positively about the in-group (Jones, 2000); and physical action to support the in-group (Fisher & Wakefield, 1998).”