Exploring the development of team identification: the contribution of social identity and the psychological continuum model

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Identity crisis: a theoretical analysis of ‘team identification’ research (2017, unknown): “Madrigal, 2000; Reed, 2002) as an umbrella term for centrality (Lock et al., 2012), emotional value (Tajfel, 1982), and interconnection (Heere & James, 2007b), which all”
Exploring PERMA in spectator sport: Applying positive psychology to examine the individual-level benefits of sport consumption (2016, background): “Research has demonstrated that a heightened sense of camaraderie at an event can influence perceptions of the social impact of the event and the purchasing behaviour of Elsewhere, Lock et al. (2012) found that relationships formed around a new team were important in the development of identification”
Examining the longitudinal structure, stability, and dimensional interrelationships of team identification (2014, result): “Furthermore, this finding also highlights the importance of developing cognitive awareness of team history and traditions in new team contexts (relative to the history and tradition available), which both supported and extended previous work (Lock et al., 2012).”