Development of the Serious Leisure Inventory and Measure

By J. Gould, DeWayne Moore, Francis A. McGuire, Robert A. Stebbins. 2008

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/931eb1a3f394545d527d1c97103ea82997ea6d1c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. A. J. Veal
2. X. Shen
3. Katie E. Misener
4. Shannon Hamm-Kerwin
5. A. Doherty
6. C. Yarnal

In Sociology and Political Science

1. A. J. Veal
2. X. Shen
3. A. Doherty
4. C. Yarnal
5. P. Wicker

Citations in the corpus

• Learning From the Experiences of Older Adult Volunteers in Sport: A Serious Leisure Perspective (2010, background): “Further, this lifestyle may directly or indirectly benefit the wider community despite the costs, tensions, and conflicts that may be experienced (Gould et al., 2008).”
• The Serious Leisure Perspective and the Experience of Leisure (2017, background): “While the SLIM scale and the structuralmodel are confined to the serious leisure form only, the study conducted to verify the scale (Gould et al., 2008) raised the question: Is a low score on one or more serious leisure qualities an indication of casualness?”
• Blowing Open the Serious Leisure-Casual Leisure Dichotomy: What's In There? (2010, methodology): “Finally, to further develop the framework into a valid reliable instrument, a more systematic psychometric approach should be followed (e.g., Gould et al., 2008).”