Replication Data for: How to Elect More Women: Gender and Candidate Success in a Field Experiment

By Christopher F. Karpowitz, Quin Monson, J. Preece. 2017

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Law, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cca778182c84dcf0da3eefc1649d0501b101440

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. A. Coppock
2. Susanne Schwarz

In Political Science and International Relations

1. A. Coppock
2. Susanne Schwarz

Citations in the corpus

• The Ties That Double Bind: Social Roles and Women's Underrepresentation in Politics (2018, unknown): “…than in other countries, but party leaders and incumbent politicians still serve as “gatekeepers” in American politics through recruitment and resource mobilization (Rasmussen 1981; Karpowitz, Monson, and Preece 2017; Kunovich and Paxton 2005; Lawless 2015; Preece, Stoddard, and Fisher 2016).”
• What Have We Learned about Gender from Candidate Choice Experiments? A Meta-Analysis of Sixty-Seven Factorial Survey Experiments (2021, background): “Similarly, Karpowitz et al. (2017) randomly induced leaders of precinct-level caucus meetings to read statements encouraging their membership to elect more women delegates to the statewide convention, increasing the fraction of precincts electing at least one woman by more than 5 percentage points.”