The Vittel payments for ecosystem services: A "perfect" PES case?

By D. Perrot-Maître. 2006

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c6967f7413c53ab5cb205f180c212868c698555

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Kai Ma Chan
2. B. Leimona
3. M. van Noordwijk
4. Emily K. Anderson
5. J. Kerr
6. P. McElwee
7. M. Chapman
8. M. Vardhan

Citations in the corpus

• The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services (2016, methodology): “Though the Vittel example comes closest to the concept of a Coasean PES it still involved an intermediary organization facilitating the negotiations (Perrot-Maître, 2006).”
• Payments for Environmental Services: Evolution Toward Efficient and Fair Incentives for Multifunctional Landscapes (2012, background): “In a market-based approach to enhancing environmental quality through freely negotiated forms of PES, one’s bargaining position is crucially important (44).”
• Banking Nature? The Spectacular Financialisation of Environmental Conservation (2013, background): “The ensuing flows and ‘cascades’ of services and payments (Haines-Young and Potschin 2010) can be seen most clearly in the case of downstream water users paying upstream users to maintain water flow and/or quality (Perrot-Maître 2006).”
• Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem? (2012, background): “Overall, there are very few examples of both private sellers and buyers of PES services that fit a truly neoliberal model (c.f. Perrot-Maître, 2006), and thus it appears we can say with some confidence from the literature that conservation-oriented PES does not yet appear to be dominated by private…”
• Payments for Ecosystem Services: Rife With Problems and Potential—For Transformation Towards Sustainability (2017, methodology): “As an example, the successful Vittel PES case in France involved substantial participation by farmers and other stakeholders in the region to design the program rules and structure (Perrot-Maitre, 2006).”