Payments for Environmental Services: Evolution Toward Efficient and Fair Incentives for Multifunctional Landscapes

By M. van Noordwijk, B. Leimona, Rohit Jindal, Grace B. Villamor, M. Vardhan, S. Namirembe, D. Catacutan, J. Kerr, P. Minang, Thomas Tomich. 2012

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/485598145fefb84f0dff75db33c1ff55f47f4472

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

When payments for environmental services will work for conservation (2013, background): “Second, service user and provider internal institutions have important PES enabling-functions, including in curbing transaction costs (Farley & Costanza 2010; van Noordwijk et al. 2012).”
Payments for Ecosystem Services: Rife With Problems and Potential—For Transformation Towards Sustainability (2017, background): “…incentives including PES have the potential to reinforce or reduce intrinsic motivations and social norms such as pro-conservation norms, depending in part on how institutions and initiatives are structured and the context in which they are implemented (Bowles, 2008; van Noordwijk et al., 2012).”
Advances in restoration ecology: rising to the challenges of the coming decades (2015, background): “…point to effective ways to map and assess ecosystem services at landscape scales (Nelson et al. 2009, Kareiva et al. 2011) while policy instruments such as payments for ecosystem services provide mechanisms for achieving multifunctionality through funding restoration (van Noordwijk et al. 2012).”
Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework (2014, methodology): “…the MBI model has been applied in many developing countries in the form of payment for ecosystem services (PES) programmes (Shelley, 2011; van Noordwijk et al., 2012; Tacconi, 2012; Derissen and Latacz-Lohmann, 2013) as a policy tool intended to address a spectrum of land management…”
Fairly efficient, efficiently fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia (2015, background): “Some authors use the term ‘environmental services’ for ecosystem services beyond provisioning (van Noordwijk et al., 2012).”
Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere (2015, background): “…the novel habitats of anthromes as part of multifunctional landscape management approaches (Antrop 2006, Bennett et al. 2006, Kleijn et al. 2011, Tomich et al. 2011, van Noordwijk et al. 2012, Ellis 2013, Hobbs et al. 2014, Jantz et al. 2014, Martin et al. 2014, Marvier 2014, Quinn et al. 2014).”
The PES Conceit: Revisiting the Relationship between Payments for Environmental Services and Neoliberal Conservation (2017, background): “…intended to provide a payment to incentivize preservation of ES that might not otherwise occur and those intended merely to ‘compensate’ providers for the services they already deliver anyway (CES rather than PES) (McAfee and Shapiro 2010; van Noordwijk et al. 2012; Muradian et al. 2013).”