Dopamine, Reward Prediction Error, and Economics

By Andrew Caplin, Mark Dean. 2008

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c5b7345178150c605eff47ac3eebd27e076bdfc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Scott A. Huettel
2. Juan D. Carrillo
3. Isabelle Brocas
4. John A. Clithero
5. Gavan J. Fitzsimons
6. Vinod Venkatraman

In General Decision Sciences

1. Isabelle Brocas
2. Juan D. Carrillo
3. Scott A. Huettel
4. John A. Clithero
5. Gavan J. Fitzsimons
6. Vinod Venkatraman
7. James D. Grayot
8. Jean Tirole

In Safety Research

1. Juan D. Carrillo
2. Isabelle Brocas
3. Scott A. Huettel
4. John A. Clithero
5. Vinod Venkatraman
6. James D. Grayot

Citations in the corpus

• Dual-process theories of decision-making: A selective survey (2014, methodology): “Other important contributions left out of the review include for example the axiomatic model of dopaminergic function developed by Caplin and Dean (2008) and tested by Caplin, Dean, Glimcher, and Routledge (2010).”
• New Scanner Data for Brand Marketers: How Neuroscience Can Help Better Understand Differences in Brand Preferences (2012, background): “Economists are increasingly interested in the processes behind observed behavior (Caplin & Dean, 2008; Gabaix, Laibson, Moloche, & Weinberg, 2006) and marketers have a long-standing desire to understand the process behind choices (Weber & Johnson, 2009).”