Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of proenvironmental behavior intention

By Tommy Gärling, Satoshi Fujii, Anita Gärling, Cecilia Jakobsson. 2003

501 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c4bf686edc02bb767e65ebe7f148d0c883957e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

General Beliefs and the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Role of Environmental Concerns in the TPB (2007, background): “Another line of research focuses on relationships between environmental behavior (e.g., travel mode choice) and general environmental beliefs (e.g., Garling, Fujii, Garling, & Jakobsson, 2003; Kaiser, Wolfing, & Fuhrer, 1999; Nordlund & Garvill, 2002; Schultz & Zelezny, 1998; Steg & Sievers, 2000)”
An examination of recreational divers' underwater behaviour by attitude–behaviour theories (2011, background): “There is some empirical evidence that PNs contribute to the explanation of pro-environmental behaviours such as littering (Heberlein, 1972 ), yard burning (Van Liere & Dunlap, 1978), energy used (Black et al, 1985 ), environmental hazard (Stern, Dietz, & Black, 1985–1986 ), recycling (Guagnano et”
Situational and Personality Factors as Direct or Personal Norm Mediated Predictors of Pro-environmental Behavior: Questions Derived From Norm-activation Theory (2007, background): “Joireman, Lasane, Bennet, Richards, and Solaimani (2001), for instance, reported effects of a personality factor ‘consideration of future consequences’ on pro-environmental intentions (see also Strathman, Gleicher, Bonninger, & Edwards, 1994; Gärling et al., 2003).”
Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior (2008, background): “priority to collective, or prosocial, values have stronger proenvironmental beliefs and are more willing to engage in diverse types of ESB than people who give priority to individual or proself values (Cameron, Brown, & Chapman, 1998; Gärling et al., 2003; Joireman et al., 2001; Joireman, Van Lange,”
Social behavior for autonomous vehicles (2019, unknown): “Prosocials exhibit more fairness and considerateness compared to individualists (16) and engage in more volunteering, proenvironment, procommunity, and charitable efforts (17, 36–38).”
General Antecedents of Personal Norms, Policy Acceptability, and Intentions: The Role of Values, Worldviews, and Environmental Concern (2011, background): “…while egoistic values appeared to be negatively related to these beliefs and norms, policy, acceptability, intentions, and behaviors (e.g., Gärling et al. 2003; Nordlund and Garvill 2002, 2003; Schultz and Zelezny 1998; Stern 2000; Stern et al. 1995; Stern et al. 1999; Thøgersen and…”
A cross-country study of fairness and infringement on freedom as determinants of car owners' acceptance of road pricing (2004, background): “Fransson & Garling 1999; Garling et al. 2003 ) was unrelated to car owners’ acceptance of road pricing.”