General Antecedents of Personal Norms, Policy Acceptability, and Intentions: The Role of Values, Worldviews, and Environmental Concern
By L. Steg, J. D. de Groot, L. Dreijerink, W. Abrahamse, F. Siero. 2011
306 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56f21e74c243fabfe387f56060df274786d0e7d6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- L. Steg
- K. Keizer
- G. Perlaviciute
- E. van der Werff
- J. Bolderdijk
- S. van der Linden
- K. Lacasse
- J. Lurvink
In Sociology and Political Science
- L. Steg
- K. Keizer
- E. van der Werff
- G. Perlaviciute
- S. van der Linden
- J. Bolderdijk
- J. Lurvink
- Meredith T. Niles
Citations in the corpus
- The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour (2013, background): “…O’Neill (2010) did not test if the relationship was mediated by self-identity, and their study focused on environmental concern (i.e., NEP) rather than values, while values proved to be a better predictor of pro-environmental preferences and behaviour than environmental concern (Steg et al., 2011).”
- An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals (2014, background): “Altruistic values reflect a key concern with the welfare of others, and biospheric values reflect a key concern with nature and the environment for its own sake (Stern, Dietz, & Kalof, 1993; Steg et al., 2005; De Groot & Steg, 2007, 2008; Steg et al., 2011).”
- The Significance of Hedonic Values for Environmentally Relevant Attitudes, Preferences, and Actions (2014, methodology): “…that may differ in their effects on environmentally relevant beliefs, attitudes, preferences, and behaviors: altruistic and biospheric values (De Groot & Steg, 2007, 2008, 2010; Grønhøj & Thøgersen, 2009; Nilsson, Von Borgstede, & Biel, 2004; Steg, Dreijerink, & Abrahamse, 2005; Steg et al., 2011).”
- Determinants and Measurement of Climate Change Risk Perception, Worry, and Concern (2017, background): “…but people (and therefore cultures) may prioritize these values differently (Steg & De Groot, 2012); and lastly, (c) these value scales have been reliably validated in a series of cross-cultural studies (De Groot & Steg, 2007, 2008, 2010; Schultz, 2001; Steg et al., 2011; Stern & Dietz, 1994).”
- Perceptions and responses to climate policy risks among California farmers (2013, background): “Though much environmental and climate change behavior literature has considered policy support or perceptions as a major dependent variable (Barr, 2007; Steg et al., 2011; Stern et al., 1999) it is not often utilized as an independent variable.”
- Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda (2014, background): “Values are general psychological factors that guide a wide range of specific attitudes, beliefs, preferences, and behaviours [87–90], and have been proposed to play an important role in acceptability of energy alternatives G.”