Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists

By H. D. White. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2003

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c45b7864ea86a41670e61a619515a1ee6a51f45

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Citations in the corpus

A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks (2010, methodology): “…is the mapping technique of Kamada and Kawai (1989; see e.g. Leydesdorff & Rafols, 2009; Noyons & Calero-Medina, 2009), which is sometimes used together with the pathfinder network technique (Schvaneveldt, Dearholt, & Durso, 1988; see e.g. Chen, 1999; de Moya-Anegón et al., 2007; White, 2003).”
Technology Push and Demand Pull Perspectives in Innovation Studies: Current Findings and Future Research Directions (2012, background): “This analysis is particularly suitable to identifying clusters of articles that span boundaries, bridging otherwise disconnected communities of research and influencing different disciplinary domains (Marion and McCain, 2001; White, 2003; Nerur et al., 2008).”
Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review (2008, methodology): “Howard White (2003a), one of the pioneers of author cocitation analysis, emphasizes the advantages of using Pathfinder networks for author cocitation mapping over the classical techniques: multidimensional scaling, hierarchic clustering and factor analysis.”
Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis (2014, unknown): “This idea can be used to explain the evolution of the science and the competition of the different paradigms (Chen et al. 2002; Kuhn 1962; Small 2003; White 2003).”
VOSviewer: A Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping (2009, methodology): “For constructing graph-based maps, researchers in the field of bibliometrics (e.g., de Moya-Anegón et al., 2007; Leydesdorff & Rafols, 2009; Vargas-Quesada & de Moya-Anegón, 2007; White, 2003) usually use a mapping technique developed by Kamada and Kawai (1989).”
Bibliometrics to webometrics (2008, background): “ACA operates at a high enough level of aggregation to be a practical tool for mapping the structures of fields [20].”
Emerging trends and new developments in information science: a document co-citation analysis (2009–2016) (2018, background): “First, the selection of these 12 journals primarily followed the paper by White and McCain (1998). IS has developed rapidly.”
Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014, methodology): “shown in Figure 2 has been taken from White (2003).”