Revenge, Retribution, and Values: Social Attitudes and Punitive Sentencing

By Ian R. Mckee, Norman T. Feather. 2008

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bcdd3d006e7a699c25791bb60047eb8fc96d574

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. M. Ross
2. Monica M. Gerber
3. Michele J. Gelfand
4. Karina Schumann
5. Ryan Fehr
6. J. Jackson
7. Emily Gray
8. Stephen Farrall

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Monica M. Gerber
2. Michele J. Gelfand
3. Ryan Fehr
4. J. Jackson

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Ross
2. Monica M. Gerber
3. Michele J. Gelfand
4. Karina Schumann
5. Ryan Fehr
6. J. Jackson
7. Emily Gray
8. Stephen Farrall

Citations in the corpus

• Retribution as Revenge and Retribution as Just Deserts (2013, background): “Linked to the support of harsh punishment (e.g. Altemeyer, 1981, 1988; Colémont, Van Hiel, & Cornelis, 2011; McKee & Feather, 2008) and to retributive reactions to criminal offences (Carroll et al., 1987; Feather, 1998), RWA is also associated with moral balance, social constructiveness (Colémont…”
• The Benefits, Costs, and Paradox of Revenge (2010, background): “For discussions of differences among these constructs, see McKee and Feather (2008); Nozick (1981); Stuckless and Goranson (1992); Vidmar (2001).”
• The Forgiving Organization: A Multilevel Model of Forgiveness at Work (2012, background): “…values are associated with a desire for revenge, war, and retributive justice, self-transcendent values are associated with a preference for restorative justice and a desire to avoid revenge and war (Cohrs, Moschner, Maes, & Kielmann, 2005; McKee & Feather, 2008; Okimoto, Wenzel, & Feather, 2012).”