THE EFFECTS OF SOCIAL TIES ON CRIME VARY BY CRIMINAL PROPENSITY: A LIFE‐COURSE MODEL OF INTERDEPENDENCE*
By Bradley E. Wright, Avshalom Caspi, Terrie E. Moffitt, Phil A. Silva. 2001
254 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bc4b0b7c19063e9d9cd3504821c62dc9dced296
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jacob T. N. Young
- J. McGloin
- D. Osgood
- Frank M. Weerman
- S. Jones
- Ryan C. Meldrum
- Alex R. Piquero
- B. McCarthy
Citations in the corpus
- In the Eye of the Impulsive Beholder (2009, background): “Similarly, Wright, Caspi, Moffitt, and Silva (2001) found that the effects of self-control were attenuated among those who have strong prosocial ties in the domains of employment, school, and peers (Wright et al., 2001).”
- the general theory of crime: how general is it? (2004, background): “Wright, Caspi, Moffitt, and Silva (2001) found that criminogenic social ties (eg, association with antisocial peers) have a more pronounced effect on individuals low in self-control.”
- Statistical Models of Life Events and Criminal Behavior (2010, methodology): “It is useful to think of this issue in terms of the counter-factual model that dominates current thinking on causal inference (e.g., Winship and Morgan 1999 ).”
- Self-Control and Deviant Peer Network Structure (2009, background): “Alternatively, recent research has suggested that self-control and social process variables, such as deviant peers, operate in a complementary manner (Evans, Cullen, and Burton 1997; Wright, Caspi, and Moffitt 2001).”
- Reconsidering the Effect of Self-Control and Delinquent Peers (2009, background): “This finding is also consistent with the life-course interdependence model tested by Wright et al. (2001).”
- How Do They ‘End Up Together’? A Social Network Analysis of Self-Control, Homophily, and Adolescent Relationships (2011, background): “Several studies find social amplification effects (Gibson and Wright 2001; Wright et al. 2001; Ousey and Wilcox 2007, cf. Doherty 2006), while others, using more accurate measures of peer delinquency, have found opposite (Meldrum et al.”
- The Impact of Community Disadvantage on the Relationship between the Family and Juvenile Crime (2006, background): “A number of studies have supported this reasoning, finding that co-occurring risks for crime interact to amplify overall levels of crime (Lynam et al. 2000; Tibbetts and Piquero 1999; Wright et al. 2001, 2004).”
- School Discipline as a Turning Point (2016, background): “Thus, scholars have examined whether education can reorder the life course by opening or closing off conventional opportunity structures (Moffitt 1993; Sampson and Laub 1997; Wright et al. 2001).”
- The Robustness of Self-Control in Relation to Form of Delinquency (2005, unknown): “…crime (Bartusch, Lynam, Moffitt, & Silva, 1997; Bushway, Piquero, Broidy, Cauffman, & Mazerolle, 2001; Giordano, Cernkovich, & Rudolph, 2002; Patterson, Crosby, & Vuchinich, 1992; Piquero, Brame, Mazerolle, & Haapanen, 2002; Simons, Stewart, Gordon, Conger, & Elder, 2002; Wright et al., 2001).”