the general theory of crime: how general is it?

By S. Jones, Neil Quisenberry. 2004

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/435389925c0022ca6c7eb84a09b967387abec233

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Wesley G. Jennings
2. Christopher M. Donner
3. Alex R. Piquero
4. A. Schoepfer
5. C. R. Tittle
6. Olena P Antonaccio
7. Stephen W. Baron
8. Owen Gallupe

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Wesley G. Jennings
2. Alex R. Piquero
3. Christopher M. Donner
4. A. Schoepfer
5. Travis C. Pratt
6. M. Delisi
7. Dan Nagin
8. David P. Farrington

Citations in the corpus

• Self-Control, Moral Beliefs, and Criminal Activity (2006, background): “…found that moral beliefs was the only variable to be significant with all effects as predicted and that the total 2Even further, some theorists and researchers have been critical of the general theory on several fronts (see e.g., Akers 1991; Barlow 1991; Jones and Quisenberry 2004; Redmon 2003).”
• Low Self-Control and Police Deviance: Applying Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory to Officer Misconduct (2014, result): “…previous research which has demonstrated a link between low self-control and general deviance (e.g., Cochran et al., 1998; Grasmick et al., 1993; Jones & Quisenberry, 2004; Miller et al., 2009; Sellers, 1999), and more relevantly, the link between low self-control and occupational misconduct…”