Conjunctive Representation of Position, Direction, and Velocity in Entorhinal Cortex

By F. Sargolini, Marianne Fyhn, Torkel Hafting, B. McNaughton, Menno P. Witter, May-Britt Moser, Edvard I. Moser. Science, 2006

756 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b5daaa4edd3caadfb1fa214f44140877828051f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

1. John Widloski
2. Ila Rani Fiete

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. John Widloski
2. Ila Rani Fiete
3. Yoshua Bengio
4. Chaopeng Shen

Citations in the corpus

• Using immediate-early genes to map hippocampal subregional functions. (2007, neutral): “In accordance with this view, a spatial scaling gradient along the septotemporal axis of the hippocampus was found in spatial firing of CA1 neurons (Maurer et al. 2005), and a parallel trend was observed also in the entorhinal cortex (Sargolini et al. 2006).”
• Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: An fMRI study (2009, neutral): “Although the entorhinal cortex and temporal pole (BA 38) are associated with different roles in declarative memory (Kroll et al. 1997; Nakamura and Kubota 1995; Sargolini et al. 2006), our data suggest a connection between them.”
• Neurophysiological and Computational Principles of Cortical Rhythms in Cognition (2010, neutral): “Indeed, these “grid cells” fire whenever the rat is on any vertex of a triangular lattice spanning the whole surface of the environment (400, 703, 843).”
• Tracking the Flow of Hippocampal Computation: Pattern Separation, Pattern Completion, and Attractor Dynamics (2015, neutral): “Because of the close anatomical association between areas with head direction cells and the MEC (Witter & Amaral, 2004), along with the presence of head direction cells in MEC (Sargolini et al., 2006) and the previously described coupling between head direction cells and MEC spatial firing (Hargreav”
• The anatomy of memory: an interactive overview of the parahippocampal–hippocampal network (2009, neutral): “and this connection is likely to explain the observation that the firing characteristics of cells in all layers of the MEA have a clear correlation across layers during the performance of spatial task”
• CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation (2014, neutral): “…by the global cues, consistent with their relationship to the global-cue-dominated head direction cell system (Hargreaves et al., 2007; Sargolini et al., 2006; Yoganarasimha et al., 2006; Zugaro et al., 2001), the MEC input could not have simply driven the local-cue-dominated CA3…”
• A model of grid cell development through spatial exploration and spike time-dependent plasticity. (2014, positive): “2D spatial gridness score: We use the same gridness score for 2D spatial tuning as used in Sargolini et al., 2006.”
• Recurrent inhibitory circuitry as a mechanism for grid formation (2013, neutral): “and one stellate cell (2) from a P21 rat.”
• The head direction signal: origins and sensory-motor integration. (2007, neutral): “Sargolini et al. (2006) classified as HD cells nearly half of all cells recorded in the dorsocaudal medial entorhinal cortex, but their criteria for classification using a Watson’s U2 test was considerably less strict than other studies.”
• Accurate Path Integration in Continuous Attractor Network Models of Grid Cells (2008, neutral): “Further, the continuous attractor model predicts that the strength of velocity modulation in the head direction inputs to dMEC and in the conjunctive heading- and velocity-sensitive grid cells [33] should decrease along the grid’s stretched dimension, which corresponds to the expanded enclosure dime”
• Conflicts between Local and Global Spatial Frameworks Dissociate Neural Representations of the Lateral and Medial Entorhinal Cortex (2013, neutral): “MEC cells fire in patterns of repeating, triangular grids that tile the environment (Hafting et al., 2005), show head-direction tuning, or fire along environmental boundaries (Sargolini et al., 2006; Savelli et al., 2008; Solstad et al., 2008).”