Accurate Path Integration in Continuous Attractor Network Models of Grid Cells

By Yoram Burak, Ila Rani Fiete. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2008

777 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Grid cells in the rat entorhinal cortex display strikingly regular firing responses to the animal's position in 2-D space and have been hypothesized to form the neural substrate for dead-reckoning. However, errors accumulate rapidly when velocity inputs are integrated in existing models of grid cell activity. To produce grid-cell-like responses, these models would require frequent resets triggered by external sensory cues. Such inadequacies, shared by various models, cast doubt on the dead-reckoning potential of the grid cell system. Here we focus on the question of accurate path integration, specifically in continuous attractor models of grid cell activity. We show, in contrast to previous models, that continuous attractor models can generate regular triangular grid responses, based on inputs that encode only the rat's velocity and heading direction. We consider the role of the network boundary in the integration performance of the network and show that both periodic and aperiodic networks are capable of accurate path integration, despite important differences in their attractor manifolds. We quantify the rate at which errors in the velocity integration accumulate as a function of network size and intrinsic noise within the network. With a plausible range of parameters and the inclusion of spike variability, our model networks can accurately integrate velocity inputs over a maximum of ∼10–100 meters and ∼1–10 minutes. These findings form a proof-of-concept that continuous attractor dynamics may underlie velocity integration in the dorsolateral medial entorhinal cortex. The simulations also generate pertinent upper bounds on the accuracy of integration that may be achieved by continuous attractor dynamics in the grid cell network. We suggest experiments to test the continuous attractor model and differentiate it from models in which single cells establish their responses independently of each other.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b820ad4a35a6587b44ab03c0e70672a2ed5e9c5f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

  1. Ila Rani Fiete
  2. Timothy Edward John Behrens
  3. Mikail Khona
  4. Neil Burgess
  5. C. Barry
  6. Imre Vida
  7. F. J. Barreda Tomás
  8. Jörg R. P. Geiger

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Ila Rani Fiete
  2. Timothy Edward John Behrens
  3. C. Barry
  4. Mikail Khona
  5. Daniel Bush
  6. D. Manson
  7. Neil Burgess
  8. Zeb Kurth-Nelson

Citations in the corpus