Measuring empathic accuracy.

By William Ickes. 2001

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b33d63b524a85fdcb111d6454db68e74310e365

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Getting a Cue: The Need to Belong and Enhanced Sensitivity to Social Cues (2004, methodology): “As is customary (see Ickes, 2001), participants’ accuracy scores were averaged across the four stop times to arrive at a single index of empathic accuracy (with higher numbers indicating greater accuracy).”
Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: a person x situation perspective. (2007, background): “…extension, persons may have attributes like empathy that dispose them to prosocial motivation, but these dispositions are best understood in terms of an interaction between dispositions and contexts (Batson, 1991b; Burnstein et al., 1994; Ickes, 2001; Penner et al., 1995; Preston & de Waal, 2002).”
Empathic accuracy in coach–athlete dyads who participate in team and individual sports (2009, methodology): “An adaptation of Ickes’s (2001) paradigm was employed to obtain data of coaches and athletes’ feelings and thoughts as well as their inferences of each others’ feelings and thoughts.”
Empathic Accuracy, Meta-Perspective, and Satisfaction in the Coach-Athlete Relationship (2009, methodology): “Empathic accuracy is thought to be central to relationship research because it can facilitate positive interactions between members, leading to satisfying relationships (Ickes, 2001).”
Accuracy of judging others' traits and states: Comparing mean levels across tests (2008, background): “…accuracy was measured in people who made their judgments of a partner during or after a live interaction with that person were excluded because, in such a paradigm, judgment accuracy by one person is confounded with the other person’s accuracy of expression (e.g., Ickes, 2001; Snodgrass, 1985).”
Enhancing Empathy and Theory of Mind (2012, methodology): “The version of the Empathic Accuracy Paradigm used in this study was created by us, as there is no standard version of this measure and each researcher must create his=her own (e.g., Hall & Schmid-Mast, 2007; Ickes, 2001; Zaki, Bolger, & Ochsner, 2008).”
Carrying too Heavy a Load? The Communication and Miscommunication of Emotion by Email (2008, background): “Fortunately, research on nonverbal emotional expressions offers guidance (for reviews see Ickes, 2001; Kenny & Winquist, 2001; Noller, 2001).”
Gender Roles and Empathic Accuracy: The Role of Communion in Reading Minds (2009, methodology): “…University of Oregon, 1227 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA, 97403-1227 e-mail: slaurent@uoregon.edu people’s skill at this everyday task, i.e. their empathic accuracy, Ickes and his colleagues (Ickes 2001; Ickes et al. 1990a; Marangoni et al. 1995) have invented a clever methodology.”