The Impact of Supervision on Worker Outcomes: A Meta‐analysis

294 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The surprisingly weak evidence base for supervision: Findings from a systematic review of research in child welfare practice (2000–2012) (2013, background): “Most recently, Mor Barak et al.(2009) conducted a meta-analysis of data from 27 studies, all from the US.”
Exploring Individual and Organizational Factors Contributing to Compassion Satisfaction, Secondary Traumatic Stress, and Burnout in Domestic Violence Service Providers (2013, background): “Elsewhere, high quality supervision has been shown as protective against burnout (Barak et al., 2009), but the positive effects of supervision can be lost when providers perceive their workloads as overwhelming.”
The Synthesis of Partial Effect Sizes (2013, methodology): “Although meta-analysts have combined partial effect sizes with bivariate correlations (e.g., Mor-Barak et al., 2009), partial effect sizes and bivariate correlations should not be combined as they represent a different population parameter and overall results may be misleading.”
Professional Supervision: A Workforce Retention Strategy for Social Work? (2012, background): “Moreover, effective supervision should also improve the working environment and worker effectiveness for those social workers who are not currently seeking alternate employment (Mor Barak, Travis, Pyun, & Xie, 2009 ).”