Eco-Guilt Motivates Eco-Friendly Behavior

By Robyn K. Mallett. 2012

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a90ede63fbd9f479bc682a612f1cc194ea26558

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. M. J. Bissing-Olson
2. P. Pihkala
3. Kelly S. Fielding
4. A. Iyer
5. Thomas Bauwens
6. Neal M. Ashkanasy
7. Thomas A. Norton
8. H. Zacher

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. M. J. Bissing-Olson
2. P. Pihkala
3. Kelly S. Fielding
4. A. Iyer
5. Thomas Bauwens
6. Thomas A. Norton
7. Neal M. Ashkanasy
8. H. Zacher

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. Pihkala
2. Kelly S. Fielding
3. A. Iyer
4. Martijn van Zomeren
5. Thomas Bauwens
6. Winnifred R. Louis

Citations in the corpus

• ECO-ANXIETY, TRAGEDY, AND HOPE: PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SPIRITUAL DIMENSIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE (2018, background): “Often the discussion is centered around particular emotions, such as guilt (Mallett 2012) or grief (Cunsolo Willox 2012; Randall 2009).”
• Experiences of pride, not guilt, predict pro-environmental behavior when pro-environmental descriptive norms are more positive (2016, background): “personal pro-environmental behavior intentions as well as public expression of environmentally friendly attitudes (Mallett, 2012).”
• Why do youth participate in climate activism? A mixed-methods investigation of the #FridaysForFuture climate protests. (2021, unknown): “…with the literature on collective guilt, pro-environmental behavior, and collective action (Ferguson & Branscombe, 2010; Harth et al., 2013; Mallett, 2012; Mallett et al., 2013; Rees & Bamberg, 2014; Schmitt Jo urn al Pr e-p roo f 38 MIXED-METHODS INVESTIGATION OF #FRIDAYSFORFUTURE et al.,…”