How much land‐based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?

By Pete Smith, H. Haberl, A. Popp, K. Erb, C. Lauk, R. Harper, Francesco N Tubiello, Alexandre Siqueira Pinto, M. Jafari, S. Sohi and 17 more. Global Change Biology, 2013

607 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a6450ae25b1d114d282eaf66a7ccd1d27aefc4e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. W. Ripple
2. R. Beschta
3. Aaron J. Wirsing
4. Douglas W. Smith
5. C. Wilmers
6. Mike Letnic
7. Mark Hebblewhite
8. Mario Herrero

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Keywan Riahi
2. Volker Krey
3. S. Giljum
4. J. Minx
5. David McCollum
6. Edgar G. Hertwich
7. Pete Smith
8. Joeri Rogelj

In Environmental Engineering

1. S. Giljum
2. Edgar G. Hertwich
3. J. Minx
4. Volker Krey
5. E. Röös
6. K. Erb
7. Felix Creutzig
8. M. Patel

Citations in the corpus

• Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture (2017, background): “Emissions from deforestation and from agriculturally managed organic soils are taken from FAOSTAT (2).”
• Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling (2018, background): “…et al 2008, Wise et al 2009, Plevin et al 2010, Popp et al 2011) and the essential tradeoff with food production, even with large uncertainties about the precise impacts (Smith et al 2013, Stevanovicı̌ et al 2016, Boysen et al 2017) could be difficult to overcome (Robledo-Abad et al 2017).”
• Climate-smart agriculture global research agenda: scientific basis for action (2014, background): “dues are used to feed animals, to provide fuel for cooking or are turned into biochar [122,123].”
• Drivers for global agricultural land use change: The nexus of diet, population, yield and bioenergy (2015, methodology): “To map production to land usage there are two potential 28 approaches; either, disaggregate the feed and pasture data (Herrero et al., 2013), or, 29 aggregate the consumption categories.”
• Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages (2018, methodology): “…reviewsonparticular topicsand could therefore be used as guides for deeper investigation of the evidence (e.g. Aether 2016, Aranda et al 2014, Bhattacharyya 2013, Cook 2011, Pueyo et al 2013, Raji et al 2015, Saunders et al 2013, Shaw et al 2014, Smith et al 2013, Sola et al 2016, WBGU 2013).”
• Carbon‐Neutral Pathways for the United States (2021, background): “For biomass, the main constraint is the quantity of feedstocks that can be sustainably produced (IPCC, 2019; Searchinger et al., 2008; Smith et al., 2013).”
• Low carbon lifestyles: A framework to structure consumption strategies and options to reduce carbon footprints (2016, background): “Similarly, reductions in GHG can cause trade-offs with other non-climate related environmental issues like water scarcity, land-use change or material resources intensity (Smith et al., 2013).”