The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces
By Melody Y. Ivory, Marti A. Hearst. CSUR, 2001
991 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a1d7908a3791a295c3dec8a35472a5bf7bb6bdc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
In Social Psychology
In Human-Computer Interaction
Citations in the corpus
- Tracking real-time user experience (TRUE): a comprehensive instrumentation solution for complex systems (2008, methodology): “This allows us to capture information that is typically missed with traditional systems that only track UIEs [7, 10].”
- Usability testing: a review of some methodological and technical aspects of the method (2010, neutral): “As indicated by Ivory and Hearst [45], usability evaluation can be expensive in terms of time and human resources.”
- Empirical Studies in Information Visualization: Seven Scenarios (2012, neutral): “Categories Refs”
- European Portuguese Validation of the System Usability Scale (SUS) (2015, background): “Usability assessment is an important part of the overall design and development of a product or service, which consists of iterative cycles of prototyping, design and validation [1].”
- Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model (2006, result): “In their study on empiricallyvalidated web page design metrics, Ivory and Hearst (2001) found that usability prediction with the help of metrics matches in some cases up to 80% of the results based on expert evaluation of the same Web pages.”
- Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study (2011, background): “With regard to Q3 (Types of UEMs employed), the taxonomy proposed by Ivory and Hearst [24] was employed in order to classify the UEMs.”