Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model

By Ahmed Seffah, M. Donyaee, Rex Bryan Kline, H. Padda. Software quality journal, 2006

727 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a5901fd21d6475ed104a2972eb7f4592253f556

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

1. Tony Gorschek
2. Hartmut Hoehle
3. Michael Unterkalmsteiner
4. I. Chow
5. V. Venkatesh
6. Robert Feldt
7. R. Permadi
8. A. K. M. Moinul

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Hartmut Hoehle
2. V. Venkatesh

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluation and Measurement of Software Process Improvement—A Systematic Literature Review (2012, background): “As pointed out by Carbone et al. [242] it is necessary to understand better the abstract concepts behind the measured quantities and to construct precise operational definitions in order to improve the validity of measurements.”
• Mobile Application Usability: Conceptualization and Instrument Development (2015, methodology): “Further, mobile application controls should be immediately obvious and intuitive to use (Jokela et al. 2006; Seffah et al. 2006; Sørensen and Altaitoon 2008).”
• Usability: Lessons Learned … and Yet to Be Learned (2014, neutral): “An even more expansive scheme (quality in use integrated measurement) included 10 factors, 26 subfactors, and 127 specific metrics (Seffah, Donyaee, Kline, & Padda, 2006).”