Sample Size for Cognitive Interview Pretesting
By J. Blair, Frederick G. Conrad. 2011
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a06d7586c07e845e12425f356ed6f0f78234d50
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Sociology and Political Science
- Hiram Ting
- Mumtaz Ali Memon
- Francis Chuah
- Thurasamy Ramayah
- Michael J. Culbertson
- Nora Gannon-Slater
- K. G. Powellb
- N. A. Petersonb
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- The Practice of Cross-Cultural Cognitive Interviewing (2015, unknown): “1996; Blair and Conrad 2011; Miller et al.”
- A review of the methodological misconceptions and guidelines related to the application of structural equation modeling: A Malaysian scenario (2017, background): “The main focus of most pre-tests is to address problems that, if not resolved, would accelerate measurement error (Blair & Conrad, 2011).”
- Improving Survey Methods With Cognitive Interviews in Small- and Medium-Scale Evaluations (2012, background): “Potential limitations include undiagnosed problems that could have been detected with additional cognitive interviews (Blair & Conrad, 2011).”
- Cognitive Interviewing for Item Development: Validity Evidence Based on Content and Response Processes (2017, background): “Blair and Conrad (2011) tested this assertion and found that the probability of detecting problems and interrater reliability increased with sample size.”