Adolescent Romantic Behaviors and Perceptions: Age- and Gender-Related Differences, and Links With Family and Peer Relationships

By S. Shulman, M. Scharf. 2000

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4983175a2b18d003704b14fcb501587d98742a27

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. W. Furman
2. J. Connolly
3. O. Mayseless
4. W. A. Collins
5. I. Seiffge-Krenke
6. Marilyn J. Montgomery
7. S. Shulman
8. J. Davila

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. O. Mayseless
2. Marilyn J. Montgomery
3. W. Furman
4. I. Seiffge-Krenke
5. J. Davila
6. J. Connolly
7. W. A. Collins
8. W. Meeus

In Social Psychology

1. W. Furman
2. J. Connolly
3. W. A. Collins
4. O. Mayseless
5. J. Davila
6. I. Seiffge-Krenke
7. F. Fincham
8. Marilyn J. Montgomery

Citations in the corpus

• The Challenge of Romantic Relationships in Emerging Adulthood (2013, background): “With the passage of time, romantic relationships come to entail a unique connection between two partners characterized by increased levels of affiliation and intimacy (Shulman & Scharf, 2000).”
• Adolescent romantic relationships and experiences (2009, background): “In particular, as adolescents get older, they report that they first fell in love at a later age, suggesting that their definition of love has changed (Montgomery & Sorell, 1998; Shulman & Scharf, 2000).”
• Adolescent Marital Expectations and Romantic Experiences: Associations With Perceptions About Parental Conflict and Adolescent Attachment Security (2006, background): “We studied girls because they tend to be more interested in and attuned to romantic relationships than are boys (e.g., Shulman & Scharf, 2000).”
• Adolescents' Attachment Representations and Their Capacity for Intimacy in Close Relationships. (2007, background): “Attachment representations might be less central in this type of friendship and less strongly implicated in predicting their quality (Shulman & Scharf, 2000).”
• Psychosocial Intimacy and Identity (2005, result): “Age group differences found in dating experiences were consistent with expectations and previous research (e.g., Connolly & Goldberg, 1999; Shulman & Scharf, 2000).”
• Romantic involvement and depressive symptoms in early and late adolescence: The role of a preoccupied relational style (2004, background): “…than are boys, a phenomenon that begins during this age period (e.g., Kandel & Davies, 1982; Petersen, Sarigiani, & Kennedy, 1991), and they tend to be more interested in and attuned to romantic relationships than are boys (e.g., Richards, Crowe, Larson, & Swarr, 1998; Shulman & Scharf, 2000).”
• Testing theories of romantic development from adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence of a developmental sequence (2003, background): “Studies of adolescent romantic relationships during the high school years indicate higher values in positive attributes, including intimacy, companionship, and closeness, with increasing age (Buhrmester & Furman, 1987; Levesque, 1993; Shulman & Scharf, 2000).”
• Relationships with intimate partner, best friend, and parents in adolescence and early adulthood: A study of the saliency of the intimate partnership (2007, background): “…Seiffge-Krenke et al. (2001) failed to report a significant longitudinal link between reliable alliance in the parent–adolescent relationship and the intimate partner relationship; and finally Shulman and Scharf (2000) didn’t find an association between affection in both relationships.”