Probability-based validation of protein identifications using a modified SEQUEST algorithm.
By Michael J. MacCoss, Christine C. Wu, John R. Yates III. Analytical Chemistry, 2002
353 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48db31e1e79e823bbd807bcb544c8cc502d65209
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- Matthias Mann
- R. Aebersold
- John R. Yates III
- Alexey I. Nesvizhskii
- Michael J. MacCoss
- Ole Nørregaard Jensen
- Daniel Cociorva
- Rovshan G. Sadygov
In Spectroscopy
- Matthias Mann
- John R. Yates III
- R. Aebersold
- Alexey I. Nesvizhskii
- Michael J. MacCoss
- Ole Nørregaard Jensen
- Lukas Reiter
- Daniel Cociorva
Citations in the corpus
- Proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications (2003, background): “The last two were initially developed for unmodified peptides but have been extended to modified peptide”
- Protein Identification False Discovery Rates for Very Large Proteomics Data Sets Generated by Tandem Mass Spectrometry* (2009, background): “…to good error estimates for individual experiments (typically 10-100 LC-MS/MS runs), the complexity level at which most proteomics studies operate (MacCoss, Wu et al. 2002; Nesvizhskii, Keller et al. 2003; Adamski, Blackwell et al. 2005; Weatherly, Astwood et al. 2005; Price, Lucitt et al. 2007).”
- PhosphoSitePlus: a comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse (2011, background): “This changed in the beginning of 2004 with high-throughput (HTP) tandem mass spectrometry [MS; (7)], when articles reporting many hundreds to thousands of phosphorylation sites began appearing (8–10).”
- A method for the comprehensive proteomic analysis of membrane proteins (2003, background): “, and 1,610 proteins were identified at >95% confidenc”
- Large-scale database searching using tandem mass spectra: Looking up the answer in the back of the book (2004, methodology): “To normalize XCorr for spectral noise and peptide size, the XCorr value is divided by auto-correlation of the experimental spectrum or by the square root of the products of auto-correlations of experimental and theoretical spectr”