Electric field effects on magnetocrystalline anisotropy in ferromagnetic Fe monolayers

By Riki Shimabukuro, Kohji Nakamura, T. Akiyama, T. Ito. 2010

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/486f360219881e9f94cbd77359a0e9b0a8addede

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Hideo Ohno
2. M. Chshiev
3. Bernard Dieny
4. Fumihiro Matsukura
5. Shoji Ikeda
6. T. Dietl
7. V. Joshi
8. Claude Chappert

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

1. Hideo Ohno
2. Bernard Dieny
3. M. Chshiev
4. Fumihiro Matsukura
5. Shoji Ikeda
6. T. Dietl

Citations in the corpus

• A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB-MgO magnetic tunnel junction. (2010, background): “The interfacial perpendicular anisotropy between oxide and ferromagnetic metal ( Fe / MgO ) has been predicted by first-principles calculation and attributed to hybridization of Fe 3 d and O 2 p orbital”
• Electric-field-assisted switching in magnetic tunnel junctions. (2012, background): “On the other hand, the PMA depends sensitively on the oxidation states because it originates from the hybridization of the 3 d orbitals of transition metals and the 2 p orbitals of oxygen from MgO (refs&#xA”
• Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy at transition metal/oxide interfaces and applications (2017, methodology): “This interpretation of the origin of the iPMA at interfaces between transition magnetic metals (Co, Fe, CoFeB) and oxides (AlOx, MgO, HfOx, CrOx, TaOx) was later confirmed by ab initio calculations (Nakamura et al., 2010; Shimabukuro et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2011; Liang et al., 2014; see Sec.”