Research on Crowdfunding: Reviewing the (Very Recent) past and Celebrating the Present

By Jeremy C. Short, Dave J. Ketchen, A. Mckenny, Thomas H. Allison, R. Duane Ireland. 2017

325 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/484a904bf7a63696eb10f1f3fccdd8b11413fe0b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Information Systems

In Management Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance (2018, background): “3.0 Crowdfunding Performance Crowdfunding research to date has primarily focused on the drivers of crowdfunding performance (Short et al., 2017a).”
Dynamics of Lending-Based Prosocial Crowdfunding: Using a Social Responsibility Lens (2018, background): “Our findings are not only important for researchers trying to understand the theoretical underpinnings of lending-based prosocial crowdfunding, but also for practitioners around the world whose economic impact and opportunities are growing exponentially (Short et al. 2017).”
Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance (2017, background): “While scholars initially sought to describe the overarching phenomenon (Bruton et al., 2015; Mollick, 2014), the field has recently taken a more nuanced approach and begun to investigate specific parts of the process (see Short et al., 2017 for a review).”
Crowdfunding success: a systematic literature review 2010–2017 (2020, background): “Despite impressive growth and increasing interest, academic research on CF is trailing behind and remains somewhat limited (Short et al., 2017), with much potential for further”
User entrepreneurs' multiple identities and crowdfunding performance: Effects through product innovativeness, perceived passion, and need similarity (2019, unknown): “community excitement, and offer greater utility (e.g., Davis et al., 2017; Lukkarinen et al., 2016; Short et al., 2017).”