Implementing greenhouse gas trading in Europe: lessons from economic literature and international experiences
By C. Boemare, Philippe Quirion. 2002
161 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/480bf465ea4bca1ed4afecfbaca7490e7967b512
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- S. Monjon
- Philippe Quirion
- J. Pinkse
- Ottmar Edenhofer
- C. Flachsland
- Ans Kolk
- Robert Marschinski
- Ulrich J. Wagner
In Environmental Engineering
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Citations in the corpus
- A perspective on multinational enterprises and climate change: Learning from “an inconvenient truth”? (2008, background): “It typically involves tacit, market-specific knowledge such as rules for allocating and trading allowances, which tend to differ considerably, even within the EU (Boemare & Quirion, 2002) and is by and large organizationally embedded.”
- Addressing leakage in the EU ETS: Border adjustment or output-based allocation? (2011, background): “Output-based allocation presents both pros and cons, which are discussed in Boemare and Quirion (2002) and Quirion (2009).”
- To link or not to link: benefits and disadvantages of linking cap-and-trade systems (2009, background): “There are concerns, however, about a possible relaxation of future reduction targets, if – due to heavy borrowing in early periods – permit prices eventually rise to unacceptably high levels (Boemare and Quirion, 2002; Australian Government, 2008, pp.8–15).”