Identification of binary choice models with social interactions

By William A. Brock, Steven N. Durlauf. 2007

300 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47d29ed04dae870f3899fc9ef71ebc4bc3572d13

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Household Debt and Social Interactions (2012, background): “…a probit model for the likelihood of having a loan, the reflection problem cannot occur, given that the expected outcome is a nonlinear function of the individual level variables, except for non-generic cases for the density of model errors, e.g., uniform density (Brock and Durlauf, 2001a, 2007).”
Econometric Analysis of Games with Multiple Equilibria (2012, methodology): “In what follows, I adapt the expressions of Brock & Durlauf (2001, 2007) to keep with the previous notation above.”
Inference of Signs of Interaction Effects in Simultaneous Games with Incomplete Information (2010, unknown): “When the equilibrium conditional choice probabilities are the same for all players in a game, the average choice in each game is an unbiased estimator for the conditional choice probabilities within a particular equilibrium (see, for example, Brock and Durlauf (2007), p.”
NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS: ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND LOOKING BEYOND THEM* (2010, unknown): “Brock and Durlauf (2001), who were the first to make this point, also extend it to duration data, and Sirakaya (2006) applies it to a study of recidivism.”
Do Peers Affect Student Achievement? Evidence from Canada Using Group Size Variation (2010, background): “Brock and Durlauf (2007) have studied peer effects identification with discrete outcomes but they ignore group size variations.”
Thirty years of spatial econometrics (2010, unknown): “To empirically verify models of social and spatial interaction, an explicit accounting for spatial effects is required (Brock and Durlauf 2001, 2007; 2 A notable exception is some of the early work of Granger (1969, 1974).”
The Economic Consequences of Social Network Structure (2017, unknown): “As such betweenness is related to the notion of structural holes developed by Burt (1992), who postulates that social capital is created by a network in which people can broker connections between otherwise disconnected segments. The last class of centrality measures puts forward the importance of b”
Identification of Peer Effects through Social Networks (2009, unknown): “Notable exceptions are Brock and Durlauf (2001a, 2003) that exploit non-linearities emerging from discrete choice models to identify endogenous from exogenous effects under the assumption of no correlated effects, Krauth (2006) and Brock and Durlauf (2007) that extents Brock and Durlauf (2001a) to”