Quantifying habitat use and preferences of pelagic seabirds using individual movement data: a review
By Ewan D. Wakefield, R. Phillips, Jason Matthiopoulos. 2009
211 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47b6059dadf6ffdab59e082cf698514abc8acb30
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- R. Phillips
- S. Bearhop
- Ewan D. Wakefield
- S. Votier
- J. Newton
- Jason Matthiopoulos
- S. Patrick
- Henri Weimerskirch
Citations in the corpus
- Habitat preference, accessibility, and competition limit the global distribution of breeding Black-browed Albatrosses (2011, background): “Secondly, both the temporal and energetic costs of albatross flight also vary with relative wind speed February 2011 159ALBATROSS DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT (Weimerskirch et al. 2000, Wakefield et al. 2009b).”
- Trans-equatorial migration and habitat use by sooty shearwaters Puffinus griseus from the South Atlantic during the nonbreeding season (2012, background): “…of, the spectacle of marine animal migration is ever widening as tracking technologies advance and remotely sensed environmental data are being incorporated in increasingly sophisticated ways (Shaffer et al. 2006, Felicísimo et al. 2008, GonzálezSolís et al. 2009, Wakefield et al. 2009).”
- From hotspots to site protection: Identifying Marine Protected Areas for seabirds around the globe (2012, methodology): “Ultimately, the task is to use available data, ideally quantifying habitat use and preferences, to identify and propose boundaries for the most important sites at the population level (Wakefield et al., 2009).”
- Diving seabirds share foraging space and time within and among species (2010, background): “Patterns of spatial and temporal segregation According to niche theory, animals segregate in the use of the environment to avoid both interand intra-specific competition (e.g., Wakefield et al. 2009 and references therein).”
- Causes and consequences of individual variability and specialization in foraging and migration strategies of seabirds (2017, background): “…studies of seabirds and other marine predators since the 1990s has provided a wealth of information on numerous aspects of their ecology and life-history, including the striking variation in movement patterns and foraging behaviour of individuals (Phillips et al. 2008, Wakefield et al. 2009a).”
- Ontogeny in marine tagging and tracking science: technologies and data gaps (2012, background): “Three recent reviews of seabird ecology discussed the miniaturization of tags and the increase in remotely sensed oceanographic products as 2 major forces driving the field of seabird ecology (Burger & Shaffer 2008, Tremblay et al. 2009, Wakefield et al. 2009).”
- Sexual segregation in a wide-ranging marine predator is a consequence of habitat selection (2015, background): “However, foraging seabirds show marked associations with particular habitats 179 that concentrate prey in relatively large or predictable aggregations (Wakefield et al. 2009, 180 Wakefield et al. 2014).”
- Comparison of five modelling techniques to predict the spatial distribution and abundance of seabirds (2012, methodology): “In contrast, the marine environment is less studied and more challenging given its dynamic nature (Ready et al., 2010; Robinson et al., 2011; Wakefield et al., 2009).”