From hotspots to site protection: Identifying Marine Protected Areas for seabirds around the globe

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): the development and characteristics of a global inventory of key sites for biodiversity (2018, background): “IBA history and characteristics 181 data-collection and analytical approaches, resulting in the first repeatable methods of site selection in both coastal and pelagic waters (Ramírez et al. 2008, Arcos et al. 2009, Lascelles et al. 2012).”
Migratory marine species: their status, threats and conservation management needs (2014, background): “Multi-taxa aggregations, particularly species adapted to exploit highly clumped prey, can be found in areas of greatest food availability (Lascelles et al., 2012).”
Applying global criteria to tracking data to define important areas for marine conservation (2016, background): “Consequently there is widespread interest in using tracking data to identify biodiversity hotspots, particularly to define candidate sites for formal protection and other forms of management (Block et al., 2011; Lascelles et al., 2012).”
Threats to seabirds: A global assessment (2019, background): “Tackling the problem of over ﬁ shing may involve the creation of Marine Protected Areas (Hyrenbach et al., 2000; Lascelles et al., 2012), including no-take zones (seasonal or permanent) in some critical cases (Daunt et al., 2008; Pichegru et al., 2010).”
Seabird conservation status, threats and priority actions: a global assessment (2012, background): “See Lord Howe Board (2009). Note 3.”