Diving seabirds share foraging space and time within and among species

By J. Masello, Roger Mundry, Maud Poisbleau, L. Demongin, C. Voigt, Martin Wikelski, P. Quillfeldt. 2010

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Ecological theory predicts that animals with similar foraging strategies should not be able to co-exist without segregating either in space, time or diet. In communities, intra-specific competition is thought to be more intense than the competition among species, because of the lack of niche partitioning between conspecifics. Hence, while different seabird species can overlap in their foraging distribution, intra-specific competition can drive the neighboring populations of the same species to spatial segregation of foraging areas. To investigate ecological segregation within and among species of diving seabirds, we used a multi-species GPS-tracking approach of seabirds of four species on a small island in the Southwest Atlantic. The present study goes beyond previous work by analyzing simultaneous effects of species and colonies. We observed strikingly strong spatial foraging segregation among birds of the same species, breeding in colonies as close as 2 km from each other. Conspecifics from neighboring colonies used foraging places adjacent to their own colony, and there was little or no overlap with birds from the other colony. A zone with increased predator concentration was completely avoided during foraging trips, likely contributing to the spatial segregation. In addition to spatial segregation, we also observed intra-specific differences in other components of foraging behavior, such as time of day, dive depth and diet. These were most likely caused by optimal foraging of individuals in relation to habitat differences on a local scale, leading to a complex pattern of interactions with environmental covariates, in particular foraging daytime, foraging water layer temperature and depth, distance to coast and bathymetric depth of foraging areas. As mechanisms leading to the spatial segregation we propose a combination of optimal foraging and avoidance of predation.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15569987642dd6f5e1e70d58875e8b360162cd2b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. P. Diasb
2. Jonathan A. Greenc
3. Herculano Andrade Dinisu
4. Justine Dossab
5. Jez Blackburnh
6. Juan F. Masellod
7. Ana P. B. Carneirob
8. Brendan J. Godleyk

Citations in the corpus

• Spatial scales of marine conservation management for breeding seabirds (2018, methodology): “These summaries were also calculated using just the first trip of any given individual to reduce pseudo-replication [55,56], but this data reduction did not alter the broad taxonomic pattern (Table S2).”